The Elderly Health Journal (EHJ), with a rigorous review process and clear ethical policies, supports the publication of high-quality scientific studies. When faced with ethical issues, the journal is committed to investigating and taking the necessary measures to ensure compliance with ethical protocols, the safety of research participants, and adherence to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) principles.
EHJ follows COPE’s flowcharts, new flowcharts and guidelines, also “the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals” issued by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) (http://www.icmje.org).
The research that involves human beings (or animals) must adhere to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (https://www.wma.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/DoH-Oct2008.pdf). The privacy rights of human participants must be observed. Also, attention should be paid to the principles of participants' anonymity and their information confidentiality, which should be mentioned in the manuscript.
Authors who submit their articles to our journal must:
Ensure that their manuscripts are ethically sound and meet the necessary ethical standards reflected in EHJ policies.
Present their research findings accurately in the EHJ format including Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion.
Ensure accurate inclusion of the names of all and only those who qualify for authorship and clearly state their contributions.
Disclose any potential competition or conflict of interest at submission.
The data and methods used in the research should be presented in sufficient detail in the manuscript so that other researchers can replicate their work. EHJ recommended that the raw data be made publicly available unless there is a compelling reason (eg, participant's confidentiality).
Note that submitting the articles to more than one journal at the same time is not ethical and it is considered as misconduct.
The results of the research must not previously publish, and any translation must follow our translation policy.
For any previously published content such as figures or tables, permission to reproduce from the copyright holder is required.
EHJ follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) guidelines which state that in order to qualify for authorship of a manuscript; authors must meet all four criteria:
• Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND
• Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; AND
• Final approval of the version to be published; AND
• Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.”
For those who contributed to the research but did not have the authorship criteria, it is necessary to mention their names in the "acknowledgments section".
Any changes to the list of authors (including any addition, removal, or rearrangement of author names) after submitting the manuscript must be approved by all authors, including those who have been removed. All authors must complete and sign up for an “authorship change form” which provides a reason for the change. The journal reserves the right to review the issues related to authorship and to approve changes in authorship after the manuscript submission.
EHJ follows COPE policies in this regard.
At EHJ, we are dedicated to maintaining the highest ethical standards in all aspects of our operations and scholarly publications. Our policy on misconduct is designed to support integrity in the research and publication process, and to address any issues in a fair and timely manner.
Misconduct in research and publication includes:
Plagiarism
Plagiarism involves using text, ideas, images, or data from someone else without giving them proper credit. If you directly copy text, you must enclose it in quotation marks and cite the source. Similarly, if your study design draws inspiration from previous work, you need to acknowledge that explicitly.
All submissions to the EHJ are automatically screened for plagiarism right after they're submitted and again before publication using standard software. Papers found to contain plagiarism may be rejected or retracted, in accordance with COPE guidelines.
Image Manipulation
According to EHJ policies, any manipulation of the images in such a way as to lead to a misinterpretation of the information provided by the original image is unethical and not accepted. If image manipulation is detected during the review process or after publication, the paper may be rejected or retracted. We follow COPE policies in this field.
Data Fabrication/Falsification
Data fabrication and falsification mean unauthorized creation, presentation, or reporting of research data with the intent of deceiving the academic community are highly unethical and are an example of publication fraud, which is prosecuted in some jurisdictions.
EHJ takes following measures to prevent misconduct:
- Encouraging peer reviewers to be vigilant and report any concerns.
- Providing clear guidelines for authors and reviewers about our ethical standards.
Research Involving Human Subjects
In all research conducted on human subjects, human tissues, or human data, even non-interventional studies (such as surveys and questionnaire studies), authors must comply with the Declaration of Helsinki rules (https://www.wma.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/DoH-Oct2008.pdf) in their research report. Also, the approval code of the ethics committee should be mentioned with the name of the relevant ethics committee. Also, the ethics committee approval letter, including the research title, the date of approval, and the name of the ethics committee, must be submitted with the manuscript.
If, for some reason, ethical approval is not required, authors must provide the documentation of their ethics committee exemption. Where a study has been granted an exemption, the name of the ethics committee that made the recommendation should be listed in the “Ethical consideration” section with a full explanation of why ethical approval is not required.
Written informed consent must be obtained from all participants in the study before starting the research, and this topic should also be mentioned in the “Ethical Considerations" section. Details about the participants should be as anonymous as possible. The editors reserve the right to reject any submission that does not meet these requirements. The journal reserves the right to ask the authors to provide consent forms signed by the participants, if necessary.
EHJ follows the ICMJE guidelines which recommend registration of clinical trials in an approved public trials registry
(Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials -www.IRCT.ir
U.S. National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry - http://www.clinicaltrials.gov
EU Clinical Trials Register - https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu
WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform - https://apps.who.int/trialsearch/)
before starting the research. All Iranian Clinical Trials must be registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (www.IRCT.ir), in order to be considered for publication.
Observational studies do not require registration.
The Editor(s) and the editorial staff will take all reasonable steps to preserve the confidentiality of the authors’ and reviewers’ identities. They must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Editors
The editors of this journal are aware of the risk of conflict of interest in manuscript management and are asked to disclose potential conflicts with the author (s), if any, to avoid any decisions influenced by relationships with the authors.
Reviewers
The EHJ Journal requires referees to provide a fair assessment. As such, editors must ensure that reviewers do not have a conflict of interest, which prevents reviewers from acting unfairly. When referees are invited to review a manuscript, they are asked to consider any competing interests between them and the authors. Referees are asked to disclose any conflicts of interest while refereeing.
Journal Staff
Editorial staff members who participate in editorial decisions must provide editors with a current description of their relationships and activities (as they might relate to editorial judgments) and recuse themselves from any decisions in which an interest that poses a potential conflict exists. Editorial staff should not use information obtained through working with manuscripts for personal gain.
Corrections, Retractions, and Updates after Publication
Sometimes, after the publication of an article, it may be necessary to change the article due to reasons determined by the journal's editor, one of the reviewers, or readers, or at the request of the authors themselves. This is done after careful review by the supporting editor to ensure that the necessary changes are made by the guidelines of COPE. Any changes will be accompanied by a post-publication notice permanently and a link is made to the original published article to help the reader see both the retraction note and the article itself. This can be in the form of a corrective notice, corrigendum, and retraction. The purpose of this mechanism is to make permanent and transparent changes, to ensure the integrity of scientific records.
In case of infringements of professional, and ethical issues, such as multiple submissions, bogus claims of authorship, duplication, plagiarism, fraudulent use of data, or the like that are determined to violate EHJ ethics guidelines, a retraction will be used to correct errors in published articles. The EHJ for retraction of a published article uses the COPE guidelines: https://publicationethics.org/retraction-guidelines
This procedure applies to complaints about the policies, procedures, or actions of The EHJ Editorial Board. We welcome complaints as they provide an opportunity and a spur for improvement, and we aim to respond quickly, courteously, and constructively. The following procedures are followed:
Definition
Our definition of a complaint is as follows:
The complainant expresses his or her expression of unhappiness as a complaint.
We infer that the complainant is not simply disagreeing with a decision we have made or something we have published (which happens every day) but thinks that there has been a failure of process; for example, a long delay, a rude response, or a severe misjudgment.
The complaint must be about something that is within the responsibility of The EHJ editorial board - content or process.
How to Make a Complaint
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Use in Journal Articles
EHJ encourages the use of AI in research articles. However, it is important that authors disclose the use of AI in their articles in a transparent and accurate manner. This disclosure should be made in the Acknowledgments section of the article, and should include the following information:
The name of the AI tool or software used
The specific purpose for which the AI tool or software was used
Any limitations or drawbacks associated with the use of the AI tool or software
By disclosing the use of AI in their articles, authors help to ensure that readers are aware of the potential impact of AI on the results and conclusions of the research.
Examples of AI Use in Journal Articles: Some examples of how AI can be used in journal articles include:
Data analysis: AI can be used to analyze large datasets, identify patterns, and make predictions.
Machine learning: AI can be used to train machine learning models to perform tasks such as image recognition, natural language processing, and forecasting.
Computational simulations: AI can be used to create computational simulations that can be used to test hypotheses or explore new ideas.
At EHJ, we are committed to upholding the highest standards of academic and research integrity. We understand, however, that disputes or concerns can arise following editorial decisions. Our appeals policy is designed to provide authors with an avenue to contest editorial decisions on their manuscripts.
An appeal may be considered if the author(s) believes there has been:
- A substantial error or misunderstanding by the editor or reviewers.
- A decision affected by a clear conflict of interest.
- Evidence of bias or inadequate consideration of the manuscript.
Authors wishing to submit an appeal should do so by following these steps:
1. Submit a formal appeal via email within 30 days of the decision date.
2. Provide a detailed appeal letter stating clearly the grounds for the appeal, including specific responses to any points raised in the decision letter.
3. Include any relevant supporting documentation or data that can substantiate the claim.
Upon receipt of an appeal:
- The editorial team will acknowledge the receipt of the appeal within one week.
- The appeal will be reviewed by a senior editorial member not involved in the initial decision.
- The reviewing editor may consult with additional reviewers or the editorial board if necessary.
- A decision on the appeal will be communicated to the author(s) typically within six weeks of the appeal submission.
- If the appeal is upheld, we may overturn the original decision or request a revised submission.
- If the appeal is rejected, the original decision stands, and further appeals on the same grounds will not be considered.
Decisions to appeal must not be taken lightly, and the burden of proof rests with the author(s). We reserve the right to reject appeals that do not meet the grounds specified above.
Please note that this process is designed for the reconsideration of specific editorial decisions and does not guarantee a different outcome. The integrity of our review process is paramount, and the appeals policy is structured to ensure fairness and rigorous academic standards.
For appeal submissions or inquiries, please contact the editorial office at elderlyhealthjournalgmail.com.
Copyright Statement
EHJ is licensed under the Creative Commons (CC) Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International License. All CC Licenses allow others to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, display, perform, and copy the content of the work as long as the original authors and source are cited correctly. No permission is required for these usages. The CC Attribution-Non-Commercial License allows others to use the works for any non-commercial purposes; the editor’s permission is required for commercial purposes. Under the CC Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, authors retain the ownership of the copyright for their works but agree with the above-mentioned usage of their works by others.
Archiving Policy
The articles published by EHJ are archived on our website and also in multiple international databases around the world to guarantee long-term digital preservation.
These archives include:
Index Copernicus
Morover, all published articles in EHJ, are backed up and archived by Shahid Sadoughi University of medical sciences as the publisher of the journal.
Direct Marketing
Any direct marketing activities, including solicitation of manuscripts that are conducted on behalf of the journal, shall be appropriate, well targeted, and unobtrusive. Information provided about the publisher or journal is expected to be truthful and not misleading for readers or authors.