Volume 8, Issue 2 (December 2022)
Elderly Health Journal 2022, 8(2): 98-103 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Fotoyi Y, Cilliers L. Factors Influencing the Adoption of Mobile Health Monitoring and Care Systems by the Elderly Living at Home in South Africa. Elderly Health Journal 2022; 8 (2) :98-103
URL: http://ehj.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-263-en.html
URL: http://ehj.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-263-en.html
Department of Information Systems, University of Fort Hare, East London, South Africa , lcilliers@ufh.ac.za
Abstract: (398 Views)
Introduction: Technology can improve the health care outcomes of the elderly. However, there are many barriers to the adoption of mobile monitoring and care systems (MMCs) by the elderly reported in literature. The main purpose of this research was to investigate why elderly people do not adopt MMCs to improve the quality of their health care.
Methods: The study made use of semi-structured interviews to collect data in the Buffalo City Metropolitan Municipality, South Africa. The study sample consisted of 15 purposively chosen study participants, representing a diverse racial profile, in order to investigate the adoption of MMCs of the elderly in their home environment. The interviews were analysed thematically.
Results: The study found that social challenges like technology anxiety, the intrusive nature of the technology and attitude towards the technology will affect adoption of MMCs. Government need to address the standardisation, data governance and interoperability of the systems. The cost of MMCs were seen as an inhibitor, but could be off set against the perceived return on investment of health care. While the elderly acknowledged that MMCs can improve their independence, the design of the MMCs and training to use it was identified as barriers to the adoption.
Conclusion: The study, therefore, recommends collaborative engagements amongst government, business and the elderly to facilitate the adoption of MMCs in the elderly community to improve the quality of health care.
Methods: The study made use of semi-structured interviews to collect data in the Buffalo City Metropolitan Municipality, South Africa. The study sample consisted of 15 purposively chosen study participants, representing a diverse racial profile, in order to investigate the adoption of MMCs of the elderly in their home environment. The interviews were analysed thematically.
Results: The study found that social challenges like technology anxiety, the intrusive nature of the technology and attitude towards the technology will affect adoption of MMCs. Government need to address the standardisation, data governance and interoperability of the systems. The cost of MMCs were seen as an inhibitor, but could be off set against the perceived return on investment of health care. While the elderly acknowledged that MMCs can improve their independence, the design of the MMCs and training to use it was identified as barriers to the adoption.
Conclusion: The study, therefore, recommends collaborative engagements amongst government, business and the elderly to facilitate the adoption of MMCs in the elderly community to improve the quality of health care.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
General
Received: 2022/03/15 | Accepted: 2022/12/24 | Published: 2022/12/29
Received: 2022/03/15 | Accepted: 2022/12/24 | Published: 2022/12/29
References
1. Padayachey U, Ramalall S, Chipps J. Depression in older adults: prevalence and risk factors in a primary health care sample. South African Family Practice. 2017; 59(2): 61-66.
2. Carr D, Utz RL. Families in later life: a decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2020; 82(1): 346-63.
3. Perrold A, Muller M. The composition of old age homes in South Africa in relation to the residents and nursing personnel. Curationis. 2000; 23(1): 87-94.
4. Kudzai M, Cilliers L. Mitigating the elderly's privacy concerns when making use of mobile monitoring and Care systems. Proceedings of the 6th International Special Topic Conference on Information Technology Applications in Biomedicine; 2016 May 11-13; Durban; 2016. p. 1-9.
5. Fotoyi Y, Cilliers L. A framework to implement mobile health devices to enhance geriatric care in institutional facilities in South Africa. Proceedings of the African Computer and Information System & Technology; 2018 Jul 10-11, Cape Town: South Africa; 2019.
6. Zeissig EM, Lidynia C, Vervier L, Gadeib A, Ziefle M. Online privacy perceptions of older adults. Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population, 2017, Springer, Cham, p. 181-200.
7. Cilliers L, Gaba S. Improving the utilisation of smart technology in the home environment. Proceedings of the Design Development Conference, 2014; Cape Town, South Africa; p.1-18.
8. Wilson C, Hargreaves T, Hauxwell-Baldwin R. Benefits and Risks of Smart home technologies. Energy Policy. 2017; 103: 72-83.
9. Van Dijk TA. Society and discourse: how social contexts influence text and talk. Cambridge University Press; 2019.
10. Balta-Ozkan N, Davidson R, Bicket M, Whitmarsh L. Social barriers to the adoption of smart homes. Energy Policy. 2013; 63: 363-74.
11. Trist E. The evolution of socio-technical systems: a conceptual framework and an action research program. Quality of Work Life Center. 1981; 1-67.
12. Ngowi L, Mvungi NH. Socio-technical systems: transforming theory into practice. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering. 2018; 12(2): 310-6.
13. Mohammadzadeh M, Safdari R. Patient monitoring in mobile health: opportunities and challenges. Medical Archives. 2014; 68(1): 57-60.
14. Lawlor D, Sher M. An introduction to systems psychodynamics: Consultancy research and training. London: Routledge; 2021.
15. Charness N, Dunlop M, Munteanu C, Nicol E, Oulasvirta A, Ren X, et al. Rethinking mobile interfaces for older adults. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2016; Santa Clara, California; 2016. p. 1131-4.
16. 16. Attwood S, Morton K, Mitchell J, Von Emmenis M, Sutton S. Reasons for non-participation in a primary care-based physical activity trial: A qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2018; 6(5): 1-11.
17. Pernencar C, Romao T. Mobile Apps for IBD Self-management using wearable devices and sensors. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct; 2016; Italy, Florence; 2016. p. 1089-92.
18. World Health Organization. World report on ageing and health [Internet]. 2015. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565042
19. Kelly G, Mrengqwa L, Geffen L. They don't care about us ":older people's experiences of primary healthcare in Cape Town, South Africa. BMC Geriatrics. 2019; 19(98): 1-14.
20. Borelli E, Paolini G, Antoniazzi F, Barbiroli M, Benassi F, Chesani F, et al. HABITAT: An IoT solution for independent elderly. 2019; 19(5): 1-23.
21. Chiridza T, Wesson J, Vogts D. A Smart Home environment to support risk monitoring for the elderly living independently. South African Computing Journal. 2019; 31(1): 1-23.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
